December 15, 2025 09:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre moves to replace MGNREGA with 'G Ram G', sets stage for winter session showdown | Messi surrounded by VIPs, fans rage: Five held in stadium vandalism case | 'Messi was uncomfortable, lost his cool!': Ex-India footballer reveals what really happened at chaotic Kolkata stadium | PM Modi embarks on historic three-nation visit to Jordan, Ethiopia, and Oman | Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January | Delhi High Court slams govt, orders swift compensation as IndiGo crisis triggers fare shock and nationwide chaos | Amazon drops a massive $35 billion India bet! AI push, 1 million jobs and big plans revealed at Smbhav Summit | IndiGo’s ‘All OK’ claim falls apart! Govt slaps 10% flight cut after weeklong chaos | Centre finally aligns IndiGo flights with airline's operating ability, cuts its winter schedule by 5%

Uttarakhand HC warns Centre, says it could revoke President's rule

| | Apr 07, 2016, at 07:01 pm
Nainital, Apr 7 (IBNS) Causing a huge embarrassment to the Centre, the Uttarakhand High Court on Thursday pulled it up and warned that d the President's rule imposed in the state could be revoked, reports said.

 "No hanky-panky must be done by April 18 (probable date of next hearing ) or we can pass an order to protect the litigant - like revoke Article 356," the court said. 

The judge added, "We just want to ensure that some safeguard is in place." The court also granted the Centre time till April 12 for filing its response on two petitions filed by former chief minister Harish Rawat.

Earlier, the trust vote was slated for March 28 but the Centre imposed President's Rule on March 27, citing "breakdown of Constitutional machinery" in the state.

This was challenged by Harish Rawat before the single-judge bench of the High Court.

The judge, while ordering the floor test on March 31, had also allowed nine disqualified rebel Congress MLAs to participate in the voting.

On April 1, the High Court had directed the Centre to respond to the writ petition filed by Rawat challenging promulgation of an ordinance by the Union government on the appropriation bill.

Congress had moved the High Court challenging the central ordinance authorising expenditure in the state, which is under President's rule. It contended that the Assembly had duly passed the Appropriation Bill on March 18.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.