August 20, 2026 01:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay govt calls for action to stop students, youth from joining CJP, Left protests | Kolkata hotel fire kills 9: Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul targets ex-TMC govt, CESC over licences | Kolkata hotel fire: 9 Bangladeshi nationals, including women and a child, die in massive blaze | Tarun Tejpal faces life term? Goa govt moves Supreme Court after 2013 rape conviction | Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis

Uttarakhand HC warns Centre, says it could revoke President's rule

| | Apr 07, 2016, at 07:01 pm
Nainital, Apr 7 (IBNS) Causing a huge embarrassment to the Centre, the Uttarakhand High Court on Thursday pulled it up and warned that d the President's rule imposed in the state could be revoked, reports said.

 "No hanky-panky must be done by April 18 (probable date of next hearing ) or we can pass an order to protect the litigant - like revoke Article 356," the court said. 

The judge added, "We just want to ensure that some safeguard is in place." The court also granted the Centre time till April 12 for filing its response on two petitions filed by former chief minister Harish Rawat.

Earlier, the trust vote was slated for March 28 but the Centre imposed President's Rule on March 27, citing "breakdown of Constitutional machinery" in the state.

This was challenged by Harish Rawat before the single-judge bench of the High Court.

The judge, while ordering the floor test on March 31, had also allowed nine disqualified rebel Congress MLAs to participate in the voting.

On April 1, the High Court had directed the Centre to respond to the writ petition filed by Rawat challenging promulgation of an ordinance by the Union government on the appropriation bill.

Congress had moved the High Court challenging the central ordinance authorising expenditure in the state, which is under President's rule. It contended that the Assembly had duly passed the Appropriation Bill on March 18.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.