July 11, 2026 04:31 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Foreign franchise league enters India! BBL opener to be played in Chennai, announce Modi-Albanese | 'They could have stopped me': Vijay blames police, former DMK government over Karur stampede | 'People will correct their 2025 mistake': Electoral debutant Prashant Kishor predicts BJP defeat in Bankipur | New assassination plot against Trump? Israel's secret intelligence raises alarm amid escalating Middle East tension | Ayatollah Ali Khamenei buried at Iran's holiest shrine as Middle East crisis deepens | Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over'
Representative image/ courtesy: Pixabay

Question on atoms in NEET-UG Physics section catches Supreme Court's attention

| @indiablooms | Jul 23, 2024, at 02:49 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Amid fierce political and legal arguments over claims the exam paper for the 2024 NEET-UG test, for admission to undergraduate medical courses, leaked online, the Supreme Court on Monday heard a challenge to a single question - No. 29 - that a petitioner alleged had ambiguous choices.

The petitioner argued that this ambiguity's consequences were significant in a competitive exam with negative marks for incorrect answers.

The consequence was that 44 students, who opted for the 'incorrect' answer, were awarded 'grace marks' and scored 720/720.

The petitioner opted not to answer the question and scored 711 out of 720.

She argued that had the National Testing Agency, which conducts this exam, refused to give marks for that question, she would have scored in higher percentiles.

Instead, the NTA gave full marks to any who picked either "ambiguous" option.

"...by giving marks to those who answered even 'option 2', you are increasing the number of toppers... (this is) her argument," the bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said.

The court recognised the petitioner's argument as a powerful one and pointed to the NTA's pre-exam instruction - to follow a new, revised edition of the textbook. If 'option 4' is the correct answer as per the latest NCERT textbook, then how could those who answered 'option 2' get full marks, it asked.

To resolve this issue the court sought the opinion of experts. "We request the Director of IIT Delhi to constitute a team of three experts... requested to formulate an opinion on the correct option."

This opinion, the court said, is to be submitted by Tuesday noon.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.