April 15, 2026 02:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Waqf Act
Supreme Court resumed hearing of Waqf pleas on Thursday. Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

No change in 'waqf by user' for now till next hearing: Supreme Court to Centre

| @indiablooms | Apr 17, 2025, at 03:58 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Thursday granted a week to the central government to respond to the pleas challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act and asked for no change in "waqf by user" till the next hearing, media reports said.

A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sajiv Khanna, Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan noted the assurance from the Centre that Waqf including 'Waqf by user', which have been registered, will not be denotified or character changed.

The top court, which resumed the hearing at 2 pm on Thursday, has also asked the states and petitioners to file responses.

The next hearing will be held in the week beginning on May 5.

Hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the amended law, the apex court on Wednesday raised concern over the violence sparked during the protests.

It also questioned the Centre if Muslims would be included in the Hindu religious boards.

At the end, the judges raised three points, indicating their intention to pass an interim order, which would put some provisions of the amended law on hold.

The top court said it intended to maintain the status quo for all three procedures, on which the rules have been amended.

According to the judges, whatever property has been declared as Waqf by the user or declared by the court will not be notified.

Secondly, the Collector can continue the proceedings, but the provision will not be applicable. And third, while ex-officio members can be appointed regardless of religion, others should be Muslims, the judges said.

According to reports, 73 petitions against the Waqf Law were listed before the court.

The matter is being heard by a three-judge bench comprising  Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishawnathan.

The Waqf Amendment Bill was passed by parliament earlier this month after marathon debates in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.