March 24, 2025 10:56 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Allahabad HC directs Centre to decide on Rahul Gandhi's dual citizenship row by April 21 | Nagpur communal violence: Suspected mastermind Fahim Khan's house faces bulldozer action | Habitat Studio announces shutdown after Shinde-led Shiv Sena's vandalism over Kunal Kamra's show | Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | MK Stalin hosts mega multi-state meeting on delimitation in Chennai, BJP calls it drama | Cash pile accused Justice Yashwant Varma was named in CBI's FIR for alleged corruption, SC junked it later | London: Heathrow Airport resumes operation after substation fire causes power disruption | Bangladesh interim government not planning to ban Sheikh Hasina's Awami League | Fire at Delhi HC judge's house leads to recovery of unaccounted cash, SC collegium acts
Kanwar Yatra
Photo courtesy: Yogi Adityanath Facebook page

Kanwar Yatra diktat row: UP govt opposes pleas challenging its order to display names of owners

| @indiablooms | Jul 26, 2024, at 08:45 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Uttar Pradesh government has strongly opposed the pleas filed in the Supreme Court challenging its order to display the names of the shop owners along the Kanwar Yatra route, media reports said.

The government said in a statement as quoted by NDTV, "The yatra is an arduous journey, where some Kanwariyas , i.e. the Dak Kanwariyas, do not even stop to rest once the Kanwar is on their shoulders.

"There are sacred features of the pilgrimage, such as the fact that the Kanwar, once filled with holy Gangajal, is not to be kept on the ground; nor under the shadow of the gular tree. It may also be noted that a Kanwaria embarks on the Yatra after years of preparation."

The government told the Supreme Court the directive was issued to ensure "peaceful and orderly pilgrimage".

On Monday, the Supreme Court put a hold on the diktat that has stirred a massive row with not just the Opposition but also allies of the country's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) demanding its rollback.

Speaking to PTI, Union Minister and Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan said he doesn't support anything that brings a division among people on the basis of "caste" or "religion".

The LJP (Ram Vilas) chief said he only believes in two classes of people, rich and poor.

"We need to bridge the gap between these two classes of people. It is every government's responsibility to work for the poor, which includes all sections of society such as Dalits, backwards, upper castes and Muslims as well. All are there. We need to work for them," the young politician said as quoted by Hindustan Times.

He added, "Whenever there is such divide in the name of caste or religion, I absolutely do not either support it or encourage it. I do not think any educated young person of my age, irrespective of the caste or religion they come from, is affected by such things."

Earlier, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's Janata Dal (United), an important ally of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP, opposed the move and asked for a review of such an order.

Rashtriya Lok Dal or RLD, another ally of the BJP, has opposed the diktat as well.

RLD national general secretary Trilok Tyag said as quoted by Hindustan Times, "Why do you make someone write their name on street carts? They have the right to work...This tradition is absolutely wrong. It is up to the customer, they can make purchases from wherever they want...I would like to ask politicians - does consuming alcohol not corrupt you religiously?

"Does it happen only when you consume meat? So, why is there no prohibition on alcohol? Why do they not speak about alcohol? Because those who do business have a nexus, it is a game of the powerful. These small shops are set up by the poor. So, you are pointing fingers at them. I would demand that ban alcohol too."

As the controversy spiked, the police clarified in a statement that the intention of the order was not to create any "religious discrimination" but only to facilitate the devotees.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu