October 08, 2026 06:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Dalal Street bloodbath: Investors lose Rs. 8 lakh crore as Sensex crashes over 1,000 points | Amazon layoffs hit India, US and UK: Fresh job cuts rock e-commerce giant amid festive shopping season | Bollywood mourns Nana Patekar: Anupam Kher, Akshay Kumar, Jr NTR, Suniel Shetty pay emotional tributes | ‘He was never wavering while expressing his opinions’: PM Modi mourns Nana Patekar | Nana Patekar dies at 75: Veteran actor suffers cardiac arrest at Goa home | RBI shocks borrowers with first repo rate hike since 2023; rates raised to 5.50% | ‘Completely false’: Virat Kohli reacts to ₹5 crore claim over Premanand Maharaj visit | We’re watching it very closely: US urges Russia to share more information on plague situation | This isn’t about schools: Trump blames ‘mass migration’ and Islam for violent protests across France | ‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror
Live-In
Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against a man accused of rape.Photo courtesy: Wikimedia commons

Hard to believe a woman had physical intimacy with a man for 16 years on false marriage promise : Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Mar 06, 2025, at 03:29 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court has said it is hard to believe a woman had physical intimacy with a man in their live-in relationship for 16 years on false promise of marriage, media reports said.

The court made the observation while quashing a complaint against a bank official, who was accused by his live-in partner, a lecturer, of rape.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta refused to accept the woman's plea after she claimed to have had sexual relationship with the banker on the false promise of marriage for 16 years.

"It is hard to believe that the complainant kept on bending to the demands of the appellant for a period of nearly 16 years without raising any protest to any quarter that the appellant was exploiting her sexually under the pretext of a false promise of marriage," the bench said as quoted by The Times of India.

"The prolonged period of 16 years during which the sexual relations continued unabatedly between the parties, is sufficient to conclude that there was never an element of force or deceit in the relationship," it added.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.