April 06, 2026 01:38 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Not denied a ticket’: Annamalai explains absence from BJP’s Tamil Nadu candidate list | ‘Ghar-wapsi soon’: PoK wants to return to India, claims Imam organisation chief | Kerala polls shocker: Tharoor’s convoy stopped, security guard attacked mid-campaign | AAP drops Raghav Chadha from key parliamentary role, sparks buzz over internal rift | Amit Shah to camp in West Bengal for 15 days during Assembly polls; predicts Mamata’s defeat in state and Bhabanipur | 'BJP plotting President’s Rule, don’t fall in the trap': Mamata Banerjee on Malda unrest, urges peace | 'Most polarised state': CJI Kant raps Bengal govt over 9-hour hostage of judicial officers | Bengal SIR protest: Judge pleads for help amid mob attack after 9-hour hostage ordeal | Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow
Covid-19

Cannot remain mute spectator over Covid crisis: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Apr 27, 2021, at 11:05 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it cannot be a mute spectator to the ongoing Covid crisis and its intervention should be taken into correct perspective.

The apex court last week took the suo moto cognizance of the Covid crisis.

Several people alleged that the top court is interfering in the matters of High Courts as the latter was also hearing cases related to the pandemic.

"At a time of national crisis, the Supreme Court cannot be a mute spectator," a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhat stated.

The apex court said the objective of the suo moto case was not to supplant the High Courts or to take over what they are doing.

"The role of the Supreme Court is complementary in nature. The issues which travail state boundaries is what this court will look into and thus Article 32 jurisdiction has been assumed," said the bench as quoted by LiveLaw.

"High Courts are best situated to make an assessment of ground realities in each state and find flexible solutions for the problems faced by citizens. Therefore, we see no reason or justification to interdict the High Courts," the Bench said.

The court further said that there is still a need for the Supreme Court to intervene on certain national issues, as there might be issues relating to coordination between states.
At least 11 High Courts in the country are dealing with issues related to Covid management in their respective jurisdiction.

The bench asked for a report from the Central Government on issues related to the supply of oxygen, essential drugs and vaccine pricing and fixed the next hearing on April 30, Friday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.