August 19, 2026 09:22 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis | Rishabh Pant scripts history! Indian wicketkeeper-batter joins elite 100-sixes club in Test cricket | BJP reshuffles top organisation seven months after Nitin Nabin's elevation | West Bengal STF arrests suspected aide of ISI 'agent' Rana Rauf in Kolkata | ‘Very hopeful’: Indian envoy Dinesh Trivedi breaks silence on PM Tarique Rahman’s proposed India visit

Greenpeace urges TGBL to commit to a holistic approach that helps eliminate pesticides from tea

| | Sep 12, 2014, at 03:13 am
New Delhi, Sept 11 (IBNS): Weeks after Greenpeace released its report "Trouble Brewing" highlighting the presence of toxic pesticide residues in tea, the tea industry remains divided on the issue.
Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) demonstrated their commitment to consumer safety and took the lead in announcing Non-Pesticide Management pilots as a first step to completely phase out pesticides from tea, Greenpeace said in a statement.
 
"TGBL on the other hand is committed to an approach of reducing pesticide usage in tea which will not guarantee a phase out of pesticides from tea," it said.
 
Greenpeace had shared the findings of its research with all the companies before releasing the report and has been engaging with the companies since then. 
 
As a result of this, companies like HUL and Girnar publicly announced an approach to phase out pesticides from their supply chain, whereas TGBL, another market leader, advocated for reduction in pesticides use. 
 
Greenpeace India finds this reductionist approach inadequate as it will not help the tea industry move out of the pesticides treadmill.
 
“We have communicated to TGBL that their approach to address the pesticide menace in tea cultivation is not enough, but so far we have not heard back from them. This poses a huge question on their commitment to consumer safety, “said Neha Saigal, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace India. 
 
She further stated that substitution based approaches are not the answer; the need of the hour is a holistic ecosystem based approach that tea companies must adopt and advocate for.
 
Tata Global Beverages is one of the market leaders; hence the onus is on them to give consumers pesticide-free tea. Consumers associate TATA with reliability and sustainability, and they expect the company to demonstrate leadership and commit to whatever it takes to supply clean chai, said Greenpeace.
 
Greenpeace India demanded and urged TGBL to go the Unilever way and give consumers a clean cuppa.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.