April 16, 2025 11:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court considers issuing interim stay on 3 points of Waqf law, Centre urges for more time to explain | Amid clash with Guv, MK Stalin forms panel to maintain Tamil Nadu's autonomy | 'I have nothing to hide': Robert Vadra reaches ED office on second summons over Haryana land deal case | 'What kind of a language is this?': Opposition slams Modi's 'young Muslims repair punctures' remark over Waqf Act | Karnataka: Mob allegedly assaults woman outside Davanagere mosque, six arrested | 'Don't get provoked': Mamata Banerjee's response to Murshidabad riots over Waqf Act | UP cop mistakenly names judge as 'accused' in arrest warrant of a theft case, gets suspended | Congress only pleased fundamentalists, Waqf Act is the biggest proof: PM Modi | Salman Khan receives fresh death threat, complaint filed | Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari demands NIA probe into Murshidabad riots
AstraZeneca
Image: @UNICEF Benin

COVID-19: AstraZeneca vaccine benefits still ‘largely positive’

| @indiablooms | Apr 07, 2021, at 10:26 pm

New York: The benefits of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine are still “largely positive” and outweigh risk of rare but serious blood clots, according to an official with the World Health Organization (WHO), speaking on Tuesday during the agency’s regular press briefing from Geneva.

Dr Rogério  Pinto de Sá Gaspar, Director for Regulation and Prequalification, was responding to a journalist’s question regarding links between the vaccine and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a rare blood clotting syndrome.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) on Tuesday denied that it had established any link, following reports that one of its experts stated there was a connection. 

Expert meetings underway

Meanwhile, an EMA committee that monitors the safety of medicines has been meeting to assess the data, which is also being reviewed by a regulatory body in the United Kingdom.  WHO is following both proceedings.

“What we can say is that the appraisal that we have for the moment, and this is under consideration by the experts, is that the benefit risk assessment for the vaccine is still largely positive”, said Dr Pinto de Sá Gaspar.

He reported that “thrombolytic events” are rare, and are now being categorized in terms of their distribution within the population.

“For the time being, there is no evidence that the benefit risk assessment for the vaccine needs to be changed”, he added. “And we know from the  data coming from countries like the UK and others, that the benefits are really important in terms of reduction of the mortality of populations that are being vaccinated.”

WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety is due to meet on Wednesday, which also will look at the data, with a conclusion expected later in the week.

Stigma and virus variants

WHO continues to work with a group of scientists worldwide to develop nomenclature for variants of the new coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

Many people, including health experts, have been referring to the variants by the countries in which they were first detected, something the UN agency wants to change.

“We need to make sure that any of the names that are used do not further stigmatize a person, or a last name, or a location, inadvertently”, said Dr Maria Van Kerhove, WHO technical lead on COVID-19, responding to a question from a South African journalist.

“There should be no stigma associated with these viruses being detected, and unfortunately we still see that happening.” 

Currently there are three variants: B117, first identified in the UK; B 1.351, which was first identified in South Africa, and P1, a variant first detected in Japan but circulating in Brazil.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu