April 17, 2025 12:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court considers issuing interim stay on 3 points of Waqf law, Centre urges for more time to explain | Amid clash with Guv, MK Stalin forms panel to maintain Tamil Nadu's autonomy | 'I have nothing to hide': Robert Vadra reaches ED office on second summons over Haryana land deal case | 'What kind of a language is this?': Opposition slams Modi's 'young Muslims repair punctures' remark over Waqf Act | Karnataka: Mob allegedly assaults woman outside Davanagere mosque, six arrested | 'Don't get provoked': Mamata Banerjee's response to Murshidabad riots over Waqf Act | UP cop mistakenly names judge as 'accused' in arrest warrant of a theft case, gets suspended | Congress only pleased fundamentalists, Waqf Act is the biggest proof: PM Modi | Salman Khan receives fresh death threat, complaint filed | Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari demands NIA probe into Murshidabad riots
Astrazeneca

AstraZeneca COVID jab 'less effective against South Africa variant': Reports

| @indiablooms | Feb 08, 2021, at 12:04 am

Johannesburg/UNI: According to reports the COVID-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford offers only limited protection against the South African variant of the coronavirus, a spokesman for the British drugmaker said here on Sunday.

The statement came after the Financial Times reported that the vaccine failed to provide protection against the mild and moderate disease caused by the South African variant of the virus, Aljazeera reported.

The newspaper cited data from a trial conducted by South Africa’s University of the Witwatersrand and the University of Oxford, the findings of which are due to be published on Monday.

The FT noted that none of the more than 2,000 mainly healthy and young participants in the trial had been hospitalised or died. However, the findings are yet to be peer-reviewed.

However, the company said that it believed its vaccine could protect against severe disease, given that the neutralising antibody activity was equivalent to that of other COVID-19 vaccines that have demonstrated protection against severe disease.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu