February 04, 2026 08:05 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming | Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan

U.S. government sues Canadian resident for $1.1M over FBAR

| | Mar 19, 2017, at 06:02 pm
Toronto, Mar 19 (IBNS): A Canadian resident has been sued by the U.S. Justice Department for not having filed a form to the U.S. government listing his bank accounts outside the United States, media reports said.

Jeffrey Pomerantz, a Vancouver-area resident with dual Canadian-U.S citizenship, had been sued for the amount equivalent of $1.1 million Cdn.

Pomerantz had filed his income tax returns to the IRS and the CRA during the three years in question but didn't file a second form called the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).

In the case filed in the United States District Court in Seattle, the U.S Justice Department is seeking $860,300 US in civil penalties, late payment penalties and interest.

Pomerantz had also been accused of not filing a Treasury Form TD F 90-22.1 ("FBAR") for calendar year 2007, 2008 or 2009 to disclose the existence of any foreign accounts, said  Department of Justice lawyer Paul Butler, CBCNews reports said.

It was found out that Pomerantz had different accounts in different countries namely Canada, U.S. and Switzerland about which he had not filed a FBAR form declaring these accounts out of U.S.

There was also a discrepancy of the statements of his stay in a country with the authority records.

There were many mistakes and omissions in Pomerantz's filings to the IRS or the U.S. government which were deemed to be unintentional by Pomerantz's  lawyer who suggested petitioner had prepared his own tax returns incorrectly and had not committed any fraud.

Toronto lawyer Hari Nesathurai said in the past couple of years there had been an increase in cases of the Canadian residents being pursued by U.S. government who haven't filed FBAR reports.

Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government had negotiated the information-sharing deal following the adoption of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) in the U.S.

There had been several debates concerning this controversial agreement according to which Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) transferred information about Canadian bank accounts to the IRS, which could result in more Canadian residents being pursued by U.S. authorities for not filing FBAR reports.

Transfer of Canadian banking records to U.S. agency doubled last year.

Under the agreement, which is being challenged in Federal Court, the CRA had transferred information about thousands of Canadian bank accounts belonging to Canadian residents believed to qualify as U.S. persons under American tax law.

Many of them may be U.S. or dual citizens and others may be born in the U.S. or spend enough time there to be subject to U.S. tax laws.

 

(Reporting by Asha Bajaj)

Image of The U.S. Justice Department Wikipedia

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.