March 28, 2025 08:40 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
India ready to offer possible assistance: PM Modi on Myanmar, Thailand earthquake | Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake hits Myanmar, strong tremors felt in Bangkok | 'Complete lawlessness': Suvendu Adhikari writes to Bengal Guv over Malda violence | 'You are a liar': Mamata Banerjee faces guests' ire over Singur, RG Kar, 'attack on Hindus' at London event | 3 cops killed, 2 terrorists shot dead during J&K's Kathua encounter: Report | Kolkata couple sues IVF centre for not revealing daughter's biological parents' identity, blames it for her death | 'India is not Dharamshala', Amit Shah says as Lok Sabha passes Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 | 'Now it's our turn': Vladimir Putin accepts Narendra Modi's invitation to visit India | Gold smuggling case: Kannada actor Ranya Rao’s bail plea rejected again | Congress workers clash with police in Odisha during protest against suspension of MLAs
Death Penalty
Image: © Unsplash/Maria Oswalt

UN experts call for complete abolition of death penalty as ‘only viable path’

| @indiablooms | Oct 11, 2022, at 10:41 pm

Marking the 20th World Day Against the Death Penalty, two UN-appointed independent human rights experts on Monday issued a statement recalling that under international law, capital punishment is permitted only “in very limited circumstances”.

“The reality remains that in practice it is almost impossible for States to impose capital punishment while meeting their obligations to respect the human rights of those convicted”, said Special Rapporteur and UN expert on torture, Alice Edwards, and Morris Tidball-Binz, the UN expert investigating extrajudicial and arbitrary executions.

Tweet URL

They were reflecting on the relationship between the death penalty and the absolute prohibition against torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment,

‘Only viable path’

The said that abolishing the death penalty was “the only viable path” for all countries.

The “death row phenomenon” has long been characterized as a form of inhuman treatment, as has the near total isolation of those convicted of capital crimes who are then held in unlawful solitary confinement, they maintained.

Yet, many States continue to impose the death penalty for non-violent crimes such as blasphemy, adultery, and drug-related offences.

Under international law, those all fail the “most serious crime” standard for applying capital punishment.

‘Deeply worrying’ trend

The also flagged as “deeply worrying,” a growing trend of imposing the death penalty on those exercising their right to peaceful political protest.

And increasingly, methods of execution have been found to be incompatible with the obligation to refrain from torture and ill-treatment, or from inflicting severe pain and suffering.

Despite the fact that more than 170 States having repealed the death penalty or adopted moratoriums, last year witnessed a reported 20 per cent increase in the number of government-sanctioned executions.

Exceptions should apply

States that retain the death penalty are urged to “scrupulously apply exceptions” for persons with intellectual disabilities, pregnant women, and children, as required by various instruments including article six of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Special Rapporteurs said.

“All States are invited to consider ratifying the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR aimed at abolition of the death penalty”, they added, noting that the Protocol currently has 40 signatories and 90 States parties.

Special Rapporteurs are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights theme or a country situation. The positions are honorary and the experts are not paid for their work.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu