April 14, 2026 07:41 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Imran Khan
Image: Wallpaper Cave

Pakistan: Imran Khan govt files plea against SC order on NA

| @indiablooms | Apr 09, 2022, at 11:33 pm

Islamabad: Ahead of the voting on no-confidence motion, Prime Minister Imran Khan's government on Saturday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's decision to restore the National Assembly session.

According to The Express Tribune, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) prayed, "SC may review, recall and set aside the Impugned Order dated 07.04.2022 passed in the captioned cases which are based on errors floating on the surface, therefore, the impugned order may kindly be recalled and the captioned causes be dismissed/discharged".

The government further said that the 'impugned order be suspended' for the time being.

The review petition stated that the order, in the absence of any detailed reasons, is not a judicial determination in the context of Article 184(3) read with Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, The Express Tribune reported.

It said, "In the absence of the determination in the stated Presidential Reference, the impugned order has prejudiced the proceedings of the Presidential Reference and has blemished the entire proceedings directed to be held on 09.04.2022 without any determination therein."

The petitioner pointed out that the SC has "erred to appreciate that within the proceedings of the house, the Parliament are sovereign, independent and are not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court or any other Court.

The impugned Order is in complete violation of the law laid down through all the prior judgments on the subject as referred before the Honourable Bench hearing these causes."

Earlier, the SC had termed the dissolution of Assembly null and void and said, "In consequence of the foregoing, it is declared that at all material times the Prime Minister was under the bar imposed by the Explanation to clause (1) of Article 58 of the Constitution and continues to remain so restricted. He could not, therefore, have at any time advised the President to dissolve the Assembly as contemplated by clause (1) of Article 58." The Supreme Court also "declared that the assembly was in existence at all times, and continues to remain and be so".

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.