Citizenship Reforms
Canada ends second-generation citizenship cutoff, easing path for Indian-origin families
Ottawa: Canada approved major changes to its citizenship laws with the passage of Bill C-3, legislation designed to resolve long-standing gaps that prevented some Canadians from passing on citizenship to children born or adopted abroad.
Indian-origin families are among those expected to benefit from the new legislation, which lifts what critics have called the “second-generation cutoff”.
The bill, which received royal assent last week, will grant citizenship to people born before the law takes effect who would have qualified if not for earlier legislative rules or the first-generation limit on citizenship by descent.
The amendments will come into force on a date set by order in council.
Once implemented, Canadian parents who were themselves born or adopted outside the country will be able to transmit citizenship to children born or adopted abroad, provided they can show a substantial connection to Canada.
The federal government says the approach aims to balance fairness with the principle that citizenship by descent should reflect genuine ties to the country.
“Bill C-3 will fix long-standing issues in our citizenship laws and bring fairness to families with children born or adopted abroad,” Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab said in a statement.
“It will provide citizenship to people who were excluded by previous laws, and it will set clear rules for the future.”
The roots of the issue stretch back to the original 1947 Citizenship Act, which included provisions that caused some people to lose citizenship or never acquire it.
Amendments in 2009 and 2015 restored or granted citizenship to most of those affected, leading about 20,000 people to apply for proof of citizenship.
The 2009 changes also introduced the first-generation limit, which barred Canadian parents born abroad from automatically passing on citizenship to children born outside Canada.
In December 2023, the Ontario Superior Court ruled key parts of that law unconstitutional.
The federal government declined to appeal, saying the rules produced unreasonable outcomes for families.
Until the amendments are formally in force, an interim measure remains available for individuals affected by existing limitations.
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
