April 16, 2025 03:21 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amid clash with Guv, MK Stalin forms panel to maintain Tamil Nadu's autonomy | 'I have nothing to hide': Robert Vadra reaches ED office on second summons over Haryana land deal case | 'What kind of a language is this?': Opposition slams Modi's 'young Muslims repair punctures' remark over Waqf Act | Karnataka: Mob allegedly assaults woman outside Davanagere mosque, six arrested | 'Don't get provoked': Mamata Banerjee's response to Murshidabad riots over Waqf Act | UP cop mistakenly names judge as 'accused' in arrest warrant of a theft case, gets suspended | Congress only pleased fundamentalists, Waqf Act is the biggest proof: PM Modi | Salman Khan receives fresh death threat, complaint filed | Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari demands NIA probe into Murshidabad riots | 15 flights diverted, many delayed as dust storm hits Delhi, Haryana

Will abide by Supreme court verdict, says Sabarimala temple board in U-turn

| @indiablooms | Feb 06, 2019, at 03:32 pm

New Delhi, Feb 6 (IBNS) : Doing a U-turn, the Travancore Devasom Board, which manages the Sabarimala temple, told the Supreme Court Wednesday that it will “respect” the verdict lifting age restrictions on the entry of women to the hill shrine, media reports said.

The board is controlled by the Kerala Government, which has opposed any review of the top court's September order that ended the temple's traditional ban on women between the ages of ten and 50.

Five judges of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi,  are hearing more than 60 petitions that urge a rethink of the verdict, opening the temple doors to women between the ages of 10 and 50.

The bench also comprises Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra

 The top court gave its landmark verdict on September 28, 2018  holding that women of all ages can visit the temple."The practice of age restriction can't be treated as an essential religious practice", it had said.

Justice Indu Malhotra, however, was of the view that it was not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evils like 'Sati'.

The top court's verdict triggered waves of protests across Kerala  and as many as four dozen review petitions were filed seeking review.

Meanwhile, a plea seeking contempt action against the head priest of the Sabarimala temple has been filed, alleging that he had ordered cleaning of the premises after some women had visited the temple.

On Monday, the Kerala government admitted that just two women, between the age of 10 and 50, have entered the shrine following the apex court’s judgment.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu