August 16, 2026 07:58 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe

Uma Bharti misleading nation over Farakka Barrage, Bihar minister says

| | May 20, 2017, at 03:35 pm
New Delhi, May 20 (IBNS): Bihar’s Water Resources Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh slammed Union Water Resources Minister Uma Bharti on Friday for her claims that Farakka Barrage was not a “problem".

The Bihar lawmaker was armed with expert recommendation to consider decommissioning of Farakka Barrage as a possible alternative to address the sedimentation problem in river Ganga.

The said recommendation in the form of Delhi Declaration was made by water experts from reputed institutions such as IITs, National Institute of Hydrology, NEERI, at the conclusion of a two-day conference on “Sedimentation, A colossal impediment to incessant flow of river Ganga – Problems and Solutions”, organized by his ministry  in New Delhi on May 18-19, where the experts unanimously adopted the Delhi Declaration.

Bihar CM Nitish Kumar was present at the Conference on May 18.

“Before making such a sweeping statement Uma ji did not even bother to consult the Bihar government on the contentious issue,” Singh said.

Uma Bharti in a recent interview to The Hindu newspaper, had reportedly stated “Farakka Barrage is not the problem … I have had experts look at it…Once the waterway on the Ganga begins, developers will dredge the silt and (Transport Minister) Nitin Gadkari will find creative ways to use that, too.”

However, during the two-day conference, experts that included Prof Nayan Sharma of IIT, Roorkee, Prof. Rajiv Sinha of IIT Kanpur, Dr. Rakesh Kumar, Director, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute(NEERI), besides Magsaysay Winner Dr. Rajendra Singh among others, claimed:

i) a time-bound comprehensive study was required concerning siltation and its ill-effects due to Farakka barrage

ii) water ways were not removing silt and that dredging silt would not work as silt will come back.

The experts were unanimously of the view that “Dredging of National Waterways-1 is increasing erosion in Bihar. The project should be put on hold until a scientific study of impact of dredging on erosion is done”.

The consensus was that without the incessant flow of Ganga, it was not possible to make the river clean and therefore, instead of ‘keeping the silt away’; the strategy of ‘giving the silt its way’ should be adopted.

Attacking Bharti, Singh said since the National Inland Waterway on Ganga  would require construction of several more barrages on the river, “that would not just disturb its incessant flow, but would also convert the river into several small ponds”.

(Reporting by Deepak Parvatiyar)
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.