August 10, 2026 05:00 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal

Third SC judge withdraws from interim CBI chief case

| @indiablooms | Jan 31, 2019, at 01:28 pm

New Delhi, Jan 31 (IBNS): Justice N.V. Ramana today became the third Supreme Court judge to recuse himself from the case on the appointment of M. Nageswara Rao as the interim CBI chief, media reports said.

Justice Ramana withdrew from Thursday's hearing saying he knew Rao personally. This stalls the case again.

"Nageswara Rao is from my home state and I have attended his daughter's wedding," NDTV quoted the judge as saying.

Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar and Justice Indira Banerjee are the other judges on the bench.

This comes after Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justice A.K. SIkri had recused themselves from the case.

Dushyant Dave, the advocate representing Common Cause, the petitioner challenging Rao's appointment, has said the situation was "sending wrong signals" that the court does not want to hear the case.

"It is sending wrong signals. It is becoming personal... This court goes out of its way when it comes to removal of Alok Verma, but when it comes to new appointment, it is not inclined to hear," the report quoted Dave as telling Justice Sikri.

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi had withdrawn himself saying he was in the Selection Committee to pick the successor of Alok Verma, who was removed on January 10.

On January 11, Alok Verma resigned three weeks before retirement, refusing to take charge as chief of fire services after being removed from the post of CBI director.

Verma's resignation came after a high-powered panel transferred him to the Fire Services as Director General, after deciding that as CBI chief, he had "not acted with the integrity expected of him". His transfer came only two days after the Supreme Court reinstated him as CBI chief.

In October, he had been sent on forced leave by the government in a midnight move in which officers of his team were transferred and an interim director took over. Verma had challenged the decision in the Supreme Court.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.