March 31, 2025 01:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Eleven coaches of Bangalore-Kamakhya AC Superfast Express derail in Odisha, 1 dies | Telangana man marries two women in same ceremony after falling in love with both | Vladimir Putin says Russia won't interfere in Donald Trump's plans to 'take over' Greenland | India ready to offer possible assistance: PM Modi on Myanmar, Thailand earthquake | Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake hits Myanmar, strong tremors felt in Bangkok | 'Complete lawlessness': Suvendu Adhikari writes to Bengal Guv over Malda violence | 'You are a liar': Mamata Banerjee faces guests' ire over Singur, RG Kar, 'attack on Hindus' at London event | 3 cops killed, 2 terrorists shot dead during J&K's Kathua encounter: Report | Kolkata couple sues IVF centre for not revealing daughter's biological parents' identity, blames it for her death | 'India is not Dharamshala', Amit Shah says as Lok Sabha passes Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025

Tata Sons moves Supreme Court challenging Cyrus Mistry's reappointment as group's executive chairman

| @indiablooms | Jan 02, 2020, at 11:54 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Tata Sons on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging the National Company Appellate Tribunal's decision to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the group, media reports said.

In its petition, Tata Sons has sought a stay on the tribunal's order.

In its judgement, the tribunal on Dec 18 declared the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as the group's executive chairman as "illegal".

Mistry family Shapoorji Pallonji owns a minor 18 per cent stake in Tata Sons. He was removed as the chairman of the business conglomerate in what is called a coup in 2016. He had taken over in 2012 after Ratan Tata. He was later also removed from the board of Tata Sons.

Mistry had accused Tata Sons of mismanagement and as well operating the views of the minority stakeholders.

On the other hand, Tata Sons had rejected all the accusations.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected the petitions of two firms- Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd and Sterling Investments Corp- challenging Mistry's removal.

Mistry had then approached the NCLAT, which entertained its petition and held a prolonged hearing.

In his defense, Mistry stated again and again that his removal was not in compliance with the Companies Act and there is gross mismanagement across the conglomerate.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu