January 08, 2025 09:33 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Sheesh Mahal row: AAP leaders who were denied entry into CM's residence turn towards PM's house | Anna University sexual assault accused is a DMK supporter, not member: MK Stalin | Ajit Doval, Raja Dato discuss bilateral cooperation during India-Malaysia Security Dialogue | US President-elect Donald Trump threatens to use economic force to make Canada 51st US State, Justin Trudeau retorts sharply | Elon Musk raises concern on 'world population decline' including that of India, China | Indian-origin Anita Ananda might replace Justin Trudeau as Canadian PM | 'I won't bite': Kamala Harris tells Senator's husband as he refuses to shake hands with her | Centre announces memorial for Pranab Mukherjee, his daughter thanks PM Modi for 'gracious gesture' | Delhi assembly elections on Feb 5, results on Feb 8 | Allu Arjun visits boy injured during Pushpa 2 stampede in Hyderabad

Tata Sons moves Supreme Court challenging Cyrus Mistry's reappointment as group's executive chairman

| @indiablooms | Jan 02, 2020, at 11:54 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Tata Sons on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging the National Company Appellate Tribunal's decision to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the group, media reports said.

In its petition, Tata Sons has sought a stay on the tribunal's order.

In its judgement, the tribunal on Dec 18 declared the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as the group's executive chairman as "illegal".

Mistry family Shapoorji Pallonji owns a minor 18 per cent stake in Tata Sons. He was removed as the chairman of the business conglomerate in what is called a coup in 2016. He had taken over in 2012 after Ratan Tata. He was later also removed from the board of Tata Sons.

Mistry had accused Tata Sons of mismanagement and as well operating the views of the minority stakeholders.

On the other hand, Tata Sons had rejected all the accusations.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected the petitions of two firms- Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd and Sterling Investments Corp- challenging Mistry's removal.

Mistry had then approached the NCLAT, which entertained its petition and held a prolonged hearing.

In his defense, Mistry stated again and again that his removal was not in compliance with the Companies Act and there is gross mismanagement across the conglomerate.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.