June 20, 2026 08:39 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Italy and I never beg': Meloni fires back at Trump over G7 photo claim | No more 'brother': Stalin's formal birthday greeting to Rahul reflects deepening rift | TMC seeks disqualification of 20 rebel MPs, Abhishek says 'membership should go' | Nara Lokesh pitches Andhra Pradesh as investment hub during Kolkata visit, sets $2.4 trillion economy goal | 'Least restrictive option': Setback for Telegram as Delhi HC backs Centre's ban ahead of NEET-UG re-test | Fortuner torched, BJP leaders burnt alive: Sand mining feud ends in triple murder in Chhattisgarh | 'If Modi is the leader and India is attacked, we'll be there': Trump's strong assurance at G7 | 'Safety of Indian seafarers of utmost importance': PM Modi's strong message to Trump at G7 | Trump says Iran deal 'not final', threatens fresh strikes if Tehran ‘doesn’t behave’ | G7 declares war on global drug cartels, unveils major anti-trafficking plan
Abortion order
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court to review abortion order after Centre's concern for unborn

| @indiablooms | Oct 11, 2023, at 04:47 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Just 24 hours after the Supreme Court ordered a medical termination of pregnancy of a 26-week-old pregnant mother, the Centre cited a serious dilemma that the unborn child can be alive if aborted.

Soon, the Chief Justice of India decided to review the decision and asked the Centre to file a recall application which will be listed on Wednesday.

The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud had to strike a balance between the life of an unborn child and the pleas of a mother who stated she would be unable to raise it.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court allowed the couple to abort their pregnancy after the petitioner argued that the woman, who is a mother of two children, is suffering from various health issues and from postnatal depression.

A medical board formed by AIIMS stated the baby is currently viable (showing signs of life and having a strong possibility of survival) adding that they need a directive from the Supreme Court on whether a feticide( stopping the fetal heart) be performed before the termination of the 26-week-old unwanted pregnancy.

The panel said the procedure is performed in cases when the foetus has an abnormal development, but it is generally not performed on a normal foetus.

The AIIMS panel stressed that if a feticide is not performed then it will not be termed as termination, but a preterm delivery where the baby needs intensive treatment and care. A baby born preterm needs intensive care and there is a high possibility that it can cause physical and mental disability.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati told the bench headed by the Chief Justice that the report from AIIMS is not in accordance with the judgment that was given earlier.

Bhati said the foetus would be born alive and would be murder and not abortion of the baby.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.