May 01, 2026 06:17 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Not necessary to humiliate me with arrest’: Pawan Khera to SC over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | ‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination | I-PAC co-founder Vinesh Chandel gets bail after Bengal polls conclude | Exit Polls Give Bengal to BJP—But One Survey Begs to Differ | Big defence push: Rajnath Singh to hold high-stakes talks with Italy’s Defence Minister | “Voting without fear”: PM Modi hails record turnout in West Bengal polls | Mamata Banerjee trying to intimidate Hindu voters, alleges Suvendu Adhikari in Bhabanipur | Operation Sindoor boost: India is now fifth-largest military spender at USD 92.1 billion in 2025, Pakistan's spending is also up | ‘Got the guts?’ Derek O’Brien dares Modi to quit if Mamata Banerjee wins Bengal polls | ECI ‘harassing’ TMC, dancing to BJP’s tune: Mamata Banerjee in Bhabanipur
Shiv Sena
Image Credit: Facebook/Eknath Shinde

Supreme Court to decide on Shiv Sena election symbol on Sep 27

| @indiablooms | Sep 07, 2022, at 07:17 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court Wednesday said that it will consider on Sept 27 whether the Election Commission should proceed to decide which faction of the Shiv Sena should have the claim to the "bow and arrow" election symbol.

Both the groups, led by former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray and incumbent Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, have staked claim over the symbol.

A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice Dr D Y Chandrachud made the observation.

It asked all the parties as well as the Election Commission to file brief notes not exceeding three pages ahead of the hearing.

Senior lawyer Arvind Datar, appearing for the poll panel, said that under the Symbols Act, if there was a complaint, notice had to be issued to all the parties. He added that the process takes a lot of time.

The Constitution Bench also comprised Justices M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha.

Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing for the Shinde group, submitted that the Election Commission cannot be prevented from taking a decision. He said the urgency was because of the impending local body elections.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Thackeray group, said the August 3 order of the Supreme Court had granted liberty to Uddhav Thackeray and his supporters to seek time.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.