March 31, 2025 03:59 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'The city is dangerous': Indian origin techie claims to be shot twice near San Francisco hotel in US | Who is YouTuber Mridul Tiwari, the owner of Lamborghini that hit two pedestrians in Noida? | 'Lion does not hunt dogs': Ex-Uttarakhand CM Trivendra Singh Rawat's remark against Dalit IAS officer triggers row | President Murmu, PM Modi greet people on Eid-ul-Fitr | Eleven coaches of Bangalore-Kamakhya AC Superfast Express derail in Odisha, 1 dies | Telangana man marries two women in same ceremony after falling in love with both | Vladimir Putin says Russia won't interfere in Donald Trump's plans to 'take over' Greenland | India ready to offer possible assistance: PM Modi on Myanmar, Thailand earthquake | Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake hits Myanmar, strong tremors felt in Bangkok | 'Complete lawlessness': Suvendu Adhikari writes to Bengal Guv over Malda violence
Adani-Hindenburg
Image Credit: UNI

Supreme Court rejects plea to gag media on Adani-Hindenburg issue

| @indiablooms | Feb 24, 2023, at 06:25 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Friday said it won't issue any directive to stop the media from reporting on Adani-Hindenburg issue and that it will soon pass an order on the matter as it had already reserved its verdict on the constitution of a committee to look into the episode.

"We won't injunct the media. We are not going to issue any injunction against the media. We will pronounce our order soon," a bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chadrachud said, after hearing a mentioning by one of the petitioners-cum-lawyer, in the case, Manohar Lal Sharma, who sought a gag order on media in reporting the Adani-Hindenburg case stories.

Sharma pleaded the Supreme Court to consider gagging media from carrying reports on Adani Hindenburg Report, until the Top court delivers its order on constitution of a committee to look into the episode.

Sharma pleaded to restrain the press from publishing any kind of news related to the Hindenburg report on Adani Enterprises, but the Apex Court refused to pass any order.

The Supreme Court had on February 17, in its order said that it would not accept the sealed cover names of experts suggested by Union government for including in the committee to be set up to examine Hindenburg-Adani report that led to meltdown of Adani group shares, noting that "We want to maintain full transparency" in the case.

The Supreme Court also on February 17 had reserved its order on the appointment of a committee which will look into the entire issue and investigate thoroughly.

The Supreme Court had heard a number of petitions filed by lawyer duo -- Manohar Lal Sharma and Vishal Tiwari -- and Congress leader and Member of Parliament (MP) Jaya Thakur, and others seeking a direction for investigation against Adani Group in the light of the Hindenburg report.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu