January 13, 2026 02:00 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Markets rally big after US envoy calls India White House’s ‘most important ally’ | Kite diplomacy in Ahmedabad: Modi, German Chancellor share rare moment | ‘No ally more important than India’: US envoy sparks stock market rally | ED moves Supreme Court seeking CBI FIR against Mamata Banerjee over I-PAC raid chaos | Youngest ever! Owen Cooper wins Golden Globe as Adolescence dominates awards night | Timothée Chalamet beats DiCaprio, Clooney to win Golden Globe for Marty Supreme | Golden Globes 2026: DiCaprio’s film, Netflix series steal the show | IPAC raid row escalates! ED drags Mamata Banerjee to Supreme Court after High Court chaos | 'Easy way or hard way': Trump doubles down on controversial push to acquire Greenland | Hindu tenant farmer shot dead in Pakistan’s Sindh, sparks massive protests
Candhrababu Naidu
Photo courtesy: UNI

Supreme Court judge recuses from hearing Chandrababu Naidu's plea in skill development scam

| @indiablooms | Sep 28, 2023, at 01:59 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: A Supreme Court judge Justice S V N Bhatti Wednesday recused himself from hearing former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu's petition seeking quashing of the FIR lodged against him in the alleged skill development scam case.

Telugu Desam Party Chief Naidu is under arrest in connection with the alleged scam.

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Naidu, told the apex court bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna that he would request the CJI for an urgent hearing on the matter during the day.

However, with Justice Bhatti recusing himself, the matter would be sent back to the CJI, who will assign a bench for the hearing.

Naidu moved the Supreme Court on Saturday challenging his arrest and the FIR registered against him in the alleged Rs 371 crore scam case.

Naidu approached the top judiciary a day after the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed his petition saying that it couldn't interfere in the case, since the “investigation is on fulcrum of attaining finality”.

Justice Sreenivasa Reddy of the AP HC, while dismissing Naidu's petition, said the investigating agency examined more than 140 witnesses and collected about 4,000 documents under the registration of the crime in 2021. Therefore, the court was not inclined to interfere with the proceedings.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.