July 21, 2026 07:06 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Abhijeet Dipke has been picked up': CJP alleges police detained founder as Parliament march sparks chaos | Major twist in CJP protest: Abhijeet Dipke ends hunger strike | PM Modi calls for 'logic, not chaos' as stormy monsoon session opens amid CJP protest | Spain beat Argentina 1-0 in extra time to win FIFA World Cup 2026 | NEET protest escalates! CJP demands PM Modi's resignation after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Chaos at Jantar Mantar! Woman throws ink at CJP chief Abhijeet Dipke; he replies 'Blue is my colour' | A historic new frontier': PM Modi hails India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 launch | Mission Aagaman takes off: India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 makes history | NEET protest explodes: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke begins indefinite hunger strike after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Jantar Mantar Protest: Cops remove Sonam Wangchuk from protest site, admitted to hospital
Supreme Court

Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking clarification in Shaheen Bagh judgement

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2022, at 01:51 am

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an application seeking certain clarification in the Shaheen Bagh judgement, delivered by the apex court earlier.

"The judgement is self-speaking and no clarification is required, such applications are not maintainable," the Bench of the Apex Court, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and also comprising Justice M M Sundresh, said, and dismissed the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, an intervenor in the main matter.

The Supreme Court had delivered the judgement in an appeal filed by Advocate Amit Sahni, seeking to remove the protests against the Citizenship Amendment-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) at Shaheen Bagh, alleging that the protests were blocking the roads, affecting the right of free movement of the public.

Though the protesters vacated the site in March with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the apex court had proceeded to hear the matter on the larger issue of balancing the right to protest with the right to free movement of people.

"The issue is over, why is it listed? What's the clarification sought I don't understand. There's no clarification required. The whole issue is over. Sorry. No clarification of a judgement. The judgement speaks for itself. Dismissed," the Supreme Court said and rejected the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, who was an intervenor in the main matter.

"We have dismissed this application, there is no need for clarification, and the judgement has been passed, such an application is not maintainable, we are not going to entertain such applications in disposed of matters." Justice Kaul told the Counsel, appearing for Naqvi.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.