May 16, 2026 08:42 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple | ‘Even ex-CM can be probed’: Suvendu Adhikari’s big statement on RG Kar case | Big action in RG Kar case: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari suspends 3 IPS officers, including ex-CP Vineet Goyal | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | BRICS sideline: Jaishankar holds crucial talks with Iran as West Asia tensions | Suvendu Adhikari resigns as Nandigram MLA, keeps Bhabanipur seat | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | NEET (UG) 2026 re-exam scheduled for June 21 amid massive 'paper leak' row | ECI announces third phase of SIR; Himachal, J&K, Ladakh excluded for now | Storm fury in Uttar Pradesh: Death toll rises to 89 as rain, gale-force winds leave trail of destruction

Supreme Court begins hearing pleas seeking quashing of adultery law

| @indiablooms | Aug 02, 2018, at 11:36 am

New Delhi, Aug 2 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing to examine the constitutional validity of adultery law, media reports said.

The pleas have been made seeking quash of adultery provision in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on the ground that it only victimizes men for having an extra-marital sexual relationship with a married woman.

Headed by Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, a five-judge constitutional bench- comprising Justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra- is hearing the case.

The bench said it is not looking to make the offence for women as well.

According to the law, any man, who gets involved into a sexual intercourse with a married women without the permission of the woman's husband, not amounting to rape, will be considered to have committed adultery.

However, as per the law, the wife cannot be punished. The man can be punished with an imprisonment for a period which may extend to five years or with fine or both for committing adultery.

The bench also considered adultery as a reason for divorce.

Advocate Kaleeswaram Raj, an Indian who lives in Italy, told The Times Of India that he is seeking the quash of the law as it is not gender neutral and violates the fundamental right to privacy.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.