April 02, 2026 02:08 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead
Congress veteran Sonia Gandhi turned 79 on Tuesday. Photo: X/INC.

Sonia Gandhi’s ‘Vande Mataram’ greeting adds new layer to escalating national song row? Find out

| @indiablooms | Dec 09, 2025, at 09:14 pm

On her 79th birthday, Congress veteran Sonia Gandhi briefly responded to reporters with a smiling “Vande Mataram”, a remark that immediately fed into a political storm already intensifying for two days over the national song.

The exchange came after a fierce round of attacks and counterattacks between the ruling BJP and the Congress, triggered by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s accusation that former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had objected to Vande Mataram as it might “irritate Muslims”, echoing, he claimed, Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s stance.

Although Rahul Gandhi was initially expected to respond, it was Priyanka Gandhi Vadra who took the lead.

On Tuesday, the Wayanad MP delivered a sharp rebuttal, alleging that the BJP was deliberately dragging the opposition into a debate over Vande Mataram to score political points ahead of next year’s West Bengal election.

She also hit out at the Prime Minister and the BJP for “selectively quoting” Nehru’s letters to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, presenting excerpts without context to imply bias.

The BJP swiftly countered. Home Minister Amit Shah argued that the national song transcends regional identity, saying, “It is true Bankim Chandra Chatterjee was born in Bengal, but Vande Mataram is not restricted to Bengal.”

Party leaders have accused the Congress of disrespecting the song by adopting a shortened version in 1937 and “pandering to communal considerations”.

The Congress, in turn, claimed the BJP and the RSS “avoid” singing the song themselves, a charge party chief Mallikarjun Kharge underscored by calling it “deeply ironic that those claiming to be guardians of nationalism have never sung Vande Mataram”.

At the centre of the row are six additional stanzas in Bankim Chandra Chatterjee’s composition that invoke Hindu goddesses Durga, Lakshmi and Saraswati.

In 1937, under Nehru’s leadership, the Congress Working Committee recommended that only the first two stanzas be used at national functions, arguing that religious imagery made the other verses unacceptable to sections of the Muslim community.

The resolution, however, allowed individuals to sing any version they preferred.

The BJP has now revived that decades-old decision as a political flashpoint, with Prime Minister Modi claiming the exclusions “sowed the seeds of the nation’s division” and contributed to the climate that preceded Partition.

Sonia Gandhi’s brief greeting, delivered without elaboration, added yet another layer to a debate that shows no signs of cooling, and one that has quickly become a symbolic battleground as both sides look ahead to high-stakes state contests.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.