January 09, 2025 12:25 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
6 dead in stampede near Tirupati temple during token distribution to offer prayers | Prominent journalist-film producer Pritish Nandy dies of cardiac arrest at 73 | Thousands, including Hollywood stars, flee Los Angeles upscale neighbourhood as wildfire engulfs homes | Sheesh Mahal row: AAP leaders who were denied entry into CM's residence turn towards PM's house | Anna University sexual assault accused is a DMK supporter, not member: MK Stalin | Ajit Doval, Raja Dato discuss bilateral cooperation during India-Malaysia Security Dialogue | US President-elect Donald Trump threatens to use economic force to make Canada 51st US State, Justin Trudeau retorts sharply | Elon Musk raises concern on 'world population decline' including that of India, China | Indian-origin Anita Ananda might replace Justin Trudeau as Canadian PM | 'I won't bite': Kamala Harris tells Senator's husband as he refuses to shake hands with her

Some CMs who backed land bill earlier now opposing it : Jaitley

| | Jul 15, 2015, at 09:39 pm
New Delhi, Jul 15 (IBNS) The NDA Government on Wednesday admitted that some Chief Ministers who earlier agreed to land bill amendment were now opposed to it, while asserting that though the centre wanted consensus on the issue it could not wait for an indefinite period.

Addressing a press conference in the  capital following the NITI Aayog meeting chaired by the Prime Ministe,  claimed that several Chief Ministers had earlier agreed the land bill amendments.ind

"Some Chief Ministers who earlier agreed to the amendments in the land bill later opposed it," he said, adding that land was "urgently required for development".

Many opposition chief ministers skipped the meeting called mainly to discuss the government's controversial land acquisition bill.

"Those who chose to boycott must introspect whether not attending is in consonance with the spirit of cooperative federalism," said Jaitley.

Among the chief ministers belonging to opposition parties only Nitish Kumar and Arvind Kejriwal respectively from Bihar and Delhi attended the meet.

Briefing reporters  after the meeting the Finance Minister said  Nitish Kumar is of the view that time was not right for the land bill.  Kejriwal said the bill's provisions should be tested first.

Jaitley said  most states were not able to implement the Land Acquisition Act passed in 2013 by the previous Congress government. "There was a common view raised by many States that the Land Acquisition Act needs to be amended," he said.

The Finance Minister also said that many chief ministers felt the delay in implementing the land bill was slowing development projects.

He suggested that  the Centre must either evolve a consensus on the land bill or give flexibility to states to frame their own laws.

West Bengal's Mamata Banerjee did not attend the meeting; she wrote to the PM saying she could not attend as her party opposes the bill and wants it withdrawn.

Naveen Patnaik from Odisha and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav pleaded prior engagements.

The Congress' nine chief ministers did not attend, but the Left's Manik Sarkar of Tripura did.

Jaitley said the Prime Minister promised that the Centre will take into account all the suggestions made by the states and that the government will make it a priority to ensure that development is not stalled.

A joint committee of Parliament is reviewing the bill after Opposition parties stalled it in the last session.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.