January 09, 2026 10:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Trump backs bill threatening 500% tariffs on India over Russian oil trade | ED alleges Mamata 'forcibly removed documents' during IPAC raids, CM calls Amit Shah 'nasty Home Minister' | 'Nasty Home Minister!': Mamata slams Amit Shah after ED raids IPAC office and firm head Pratik Jain | ED raids IPAC office, Pratik Jain’s home in coal scam probe; Mamata Banerjee rushes in, takes on BJP | TMC moves Supreme Court against ECI over SIR, alleges ‘WhatsApp Commission’ in voter revision | Madurai HC shocks DMK! Hilltop Karthigai Deepam allowed, court slams ‘unnecessary politicisation’ – Hindus celebrate big victory! | Suresh Kalmadi, ex-Union Minister and controversial Commonwealth Games chief, passes away at 81 | Bangladesh bans IPL telecast after KKR drops Mustafizur Rahman | ‘Qualitatively different’: Supreme Court shuts bail door on Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in Delhi riots case | ‘Modi is a good guy,’ says Trump — then comes the tariff threat over Russian oil
Sena vs Sena

Sena's Uddhav Thackeray faction moves SC objecting to a meeting between Assembly Speaker and Eknath Shinde

| @indiablooms | Jan 10, 2024, at 02:11 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: Shiv Sena's Uddhav Thackeray faction on Tuesday moved the Supreme Court, objecting to a meeting between Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde ahead of the verdict in the Shiv Sena MLA disqualification case.

The application filed in the form of a writ petition by the Uddhav Thackeray faction has raised objections to Speaker Rahul Narwekar meeting Chief Minister Shinde at his residence on Jan 7 whereas the verdict by him is scheduled to be announced on Jan 10 at 4 pm.

The Shiv Sena Leader has sought expeditious disposal of disqualification petitions against the Shinde faction and to place additional documents on record.

"It is highly improper for the Speaker to meet Eknath Shinde three days before deciding on the disqualification petition. The Speaker is required to act impartially. However, the present act of the Speaker raises questions about his fairness and impartiality in the decision-making process," the application stated.

The petition further said that the present act of the Speaker violates the legal maximin that justice should not only be done, it should also be seen.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.