January 23, 2025 04:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'He was dancing while walking': Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane doubts Saif Ali Khan's stabbing incident | 'Open to legitimate return of Indians illegally staying in the US': Jaishankar | New fire erupts in Los Angeles, forces evacuation of tens of thousands | 'Very clear that Trump administration is prioritising India': S Jaishankar in US | 'Stop this ridiculous war now or face tariffs': Donald Trump tells Vladimir Putin | JDU sacks Manipur Chief after he declares to withdraw support from BJP government in state | 12 dead after passengers jump off train in Maharashtra over rumours of fire and collision with another train | Saif Ali Khan's attacker wanted to treat ailing mother in Bangladesh with the stolen money: Reports | US prioritises India as Secretary of State Marco Rubio picks Jaishankar for his maiden bilateral meeting | I don't want to stop, but also want competent people: Donald Trump on H-1B visa

Section 144 imposed in Ayodhya as Supreme Court verdict on case nears

| @indiablooms | Oct 14, 2019, at 11:39 am

Ayodhya: Section 144 has been imposed in Ayodhya as the verdict on the case pertaining to whether Ram Temple will be built in the disputed land of the city is nearing.

As per Section 144, four or more people are not allowed to assemble.

The verdict is due before Nov 17.

What happened in Ayodhya and why the case is significant?

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born on that site.

On Sept 27 last year, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.