April 11, 2025 03:02 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump's latest tariff hike on Beijing brings additional rate on some Chinese goods to 145 pct: White House | Pakistan distances itself from 26/11 terror accused Tahawwur Rana, says he is 'Canadian national' | Tahawwur Rana’s extradition proof of Modi govt's diplomatic strength: Amit Shah | Adult unmarried parents can live together without marriage: Allahabad High Court | Bengal job losers hold massive rally in Kolkata protesting over police assault | Waqf Act won't be implemented in Bengal: Mamata Banerjee | Centre appoints advocate Narender Mann as special public prosecutor in Tahawwur Rana case | Internet cut off in Bengal's Jangipur after violent protest against Waqf law | Flight carrying 26/11 accused Tahawwur Rana departs US, to land in Delhi tomorrow | 2 brothers held for stabbing 19-year-old Himanshu in north Delhi over alleged affair with their sister

SC adjourns Ayodhya case, will announce hearing dates in January

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2018, at 12:24 pm

New Delhi, Oct 29 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned the case, which pertains to whether Ram temple can be built in the disputed land of Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya, till January, when it will announce the hearing dates, media reports said.

The top court will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The case will be taken up by a new bench excluding Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, NDTV reported.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

In 1992, the Babri Masjid was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

On Sept 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu