March 26, 2025 03:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Rohtak man buries tenant alive in a pit after discovering latter's affair with his wife, body found after 3 months | 'They think it is their birthright to use freedom to tear the country': Yogi Aditnath slams Kunal Kamra | Allahabad HC Bar Association on indefinite strike opposing SC Collegium's transfer of 'cash pile' accused Justice Yashwant Varma | Unwarranted: India on Pakistan's Jammu and Kashmir remark at UN | Abusing people and our culture in the name of comedy: Kangana Ranaut slams Kunal Kamra | Every action has a reaction: Eknath Shinde on vandalism at Mumbai's Habitat Studio over Kunal Kamra joke | 'Will ensure no recurrence': Samay Raina apologises for remarks made on now-deleted show India's Got Latent | Centre hikes salaries, pensions of MPs considering high cost of living | Allahabad HC directs Centre to decide on Rahul Gandhi's dual citizenship row by April 21 | Nagpur communal violence: Suspected mastermind Fahim Khan's house faces bulldozer action

Sabarimala case: SC declines early hearing of petition against verdict allowing women's entry into temple

| @indiablooms | Oct 09, 2018, at 02:13 pm

New Delhi, Oct 9 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined an early hearing of a petition filed to review the top court's verdict which allowed women of all ages to enter Kerala's Sabarimala Temple, where menstruating female persons earlier had no access, media reports said.

The top court had passed the verdict as it was hearing a clutch of petitions that have been challenging the ban on the entry of women, who are aged between 10 to 50 years, in Sabarimala Temple, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa. 

The petition against the top court's verdict has been filed by President of the National Ayyappa Devotees Association, NDTV reported.

The five-judge bench, headed by former Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, passed the judgement in favour of women with a 4:1 ratio. The only judge who had dissented, interestingly a woman, was Justice Indu Malhotra.

The former CJI was quoted by NDTV as saying, "Religion is for one dignity with identity. Right to practice religion available to men and women."

"Rules based on biological characteristics will not muster constitution," Justice Misra said asserting equality among men and women.

He also said, "Religion can't be a cover to deny rights."

On the contrary, Justice Malhotra said court should not interfere in religious matters.

The constitution protects religious practices, she said.

Several women activists have opposed the ban on the entry of women inside the temple.

Earlier in January this year, the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), which manages the Sabarimala Temple, had decided to make proof-of-age documents mandatory for female devotees at the shrine.

Sabarimala is a Hindu pilgrimage centre at the Periyar Tiger Reserve in the Western Ghat mountain ranges of Pathanamthitta District and witnesses one of the largest annual pilgrimages in the world with an estimated 45–50 million devotees visiting every year.

Lord Ayyappa's temple is situated amidst 18 hills on a hilltop.

Meanwhile, the Kerala government had said it would not challenged the Supreme Court's verdict.

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan had said the state government will ensure protection and facilities for all women who will enter the temple. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu