March 26, 2025 09:46 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Rohtak man buries tenant alive in a pit after discovering latter's affair with his wife, body found after 3 months | 'They think it is their birthright to use freedom to tear the country': Yogi Aditnath slams Kunal Kamra | Allahabad HC Bar Association on indefinite strike opposing SC Collegium's transfer of 'cash pile' accused Justice Yashwant Varma | Unwarranted: India on Pakistan's Jammu and Kashmir remark at UN | Abusing people and our culture in the name of comedy: Kangana Ranaut slams Kunal Kamra | Every action has a reaction: Eknath Shinde on vandalism at Mumbai's Habitat Studio over Kunal Kamra joke | 'Will ensure no recurrence': Samay Raina apologises for remarks made on now-deleted show India's Got Latent | Centre hikes salaries, pensions of MPs considering high cost of living | Allahabad HC directs Centre to decide on Rahul Gandhi's dual citizenship row by April 21 | Nagpur communal violence: Suspected mastermind Fahim Khan's house faces bulldozer action

Political circles anxiously awaits for Supreme Court verdict on Sabarimala tomorrow

| @indiablooms | Nov 13, 2019, at 05:24 pm

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 13 (UNI) Political and social circles in Kerala are anxiously awaiting Thursday's Supreme Court verdict on the review petitions challenging the September 28,2018 Judgement allowing entry for women of all ages into the world famous Lord Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala.

The tomorrow's verdict will be pronounced by a five-member Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra.

On September 28, 2018, a Constitution Bench of then Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra had allowed the women entry into the centuries-old temple. The court decision was widely opposed by devotees who follow the customs and traditions restricting the entry of women between the ages of 10 and 50.

In its verdict, the then Constitution Bench had, by a 4:1 majority, struck down Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965, which was the basis for barring entry of women. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu