July 18, 2026 07:47 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
NEET protest escalates! CJP demands PM Modi's resignation after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Chaos at Jantar Mantar! Woman throws ink at CJP chief Abhijeet Dipke; he replies 'Blue is my colour' | A historic new frontier': PM Modi hails India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 launch | Mission Aagaman takes off: India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 makes history | NEET protest explodes: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke begins indefinite hunger strike after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Jantar Mantar Protest: Cops remove Sonam Wangchuk from protest site, admitted to hospital | India's Rail Revolution Begins: First Hydrogen train hits the tracks | Tragedy in Bengal: Two children among three killed as train hits school van | Europe's killer heatwave claims nearly 10,000 lives, UN sounds global alarm | 'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy
Hijab Row
Image Credit: UNI

Muslim leaders slam Karnataka HC ruling on hijab issue

| @indiablooms | Mar 15, 2022, at 07:02 pm

New Delhi: AIMIM supremo Asaduddin Owaisi and Kashmiri leaders Mehbooba Mufti and Omar Abdullah on Tuesday denounced the Karnataka High Court ruling which upheld the ban on wearing of hijabs in schools calling the head scarfs not essential in practising religion.

The decision "is deeply disappointing. On one hand we talk about empowering women, yet we are denying them the right to a simple choice. It isn't just about religion but the freedom to choose", said Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leader Mufti, a former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister.

National Conference leader and another former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah added, "Very disappointed by the verdict... Regardless of what you may think about the hijab, it's not about an item of clothing, it's about the right of a woman to choose how she wants to dress.

"That the court didn't uphold this basic right is a travesty."

Owaisi hoped the petitioners would approach the Supreme Court against the High Court ruling and went on to give several reasons to back his assertion that the ruling was in bad faith.

He said the ruling "has suspended fundamental rights to freedom of religion, culture, freedom of speech and expression".

"For a devout Muslim, hijab is also an act of worship. It's time to review the essential religious practice test. For a devout person, everything is essential and for an atheist nothing is essential. For a devout Hindu Brahmin, 'janeu' is essential but for a non-Brahmin it may not be. It is absurd that judges can decide essentiality."

Owaisi added, "Not even other people of the same religion have the right to decide essentiality. It is between the individual and God. The State should be allowed to interfere in religious rights only if such acts of worship harm others. Headscarf does not harm anyone."

The Hyderabad MP said that banning headscarf definitely harms devout Muslim women and their families as it prevents them from accessing education.

"The excuse being used is that uniform will ensure uniformity. How? Will kids not know who's from a rich or poor family? Do caste names not denote background?

"When Ireland changed the rules for police uniform to allow hijab and Sikh turban, the Modi government welcomed it. So why double standards at home and abroad? Hijab and turbans of the uniform's colours can be allowed to be worn," he said.

"I hope this judgement will not be used to legitimise harassment of hijab wearing women. One can only hope and eventually be disappointed when this starts happening to hijab wearing women in banks, hospitals and public transport."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.