March 27, 2025 12:01 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Pray only to Alla': Controversy erupts over Mohanlal offering puja at Sabarimala for Mammootty | Chennai techie counters wife’s ‘sex-predator’, ‘abduction of their child’ charges amid bitter custody battle | Kunal Kamra gets second summons, posts satirical song targeting Nirmala Sitharaman | 'Entity of concern': India lambasts US religious freedom body over demand to sanction RAW | 'It was Mrityunjay Mahakumbh': Yogi Adityanath slams Mamata Banerjee's 'Mrityu Kumbh' remark | Bhupesh Baghel raided by CBI in Mahadev betting app case | Muslims are safe only when Hindus are safe: Yogi Adityanath | Rohtak man buries tenant alive in a pit after discovering latter's affair with his wife, body found after 3 months | 'They think it is their birthright to use freedom to tear the country': Yogi Aditnath slams Kunal Kamra | Allahabad HC Bar Association on indefinite strike opposing SC Collegium's transfer of 'cash pile' accused Justice Yashwant Varma
Maratha reservation
Image credit: UNI

Bombay HC to deliver Maratha reservation interim stay verdict on April 10

| @@indiablooms | Mar 13, 2024, at 04:10 am

Mumbai/IBNS/UNI: A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor of the Bombay High Court on Tuesday indicated that it would decide on April 10 on the issue of granting an interim stay on the government’s decision to grant reservation to the Maratha community.

The bench was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the law passed by the Maharashtra Legislature granting 10 percent reservation to the Maratha community.

On Tuesday, the petitioners sought a stay on the implementation of the Act, pending a final hearing decision in the petitions.

The court said before granting any interim stay it has to hear all the parties.

“It is not a simple administrative order. It is a legislation. Hence, we have to keep in mind the principles laid down while hearing pleas challenging constitutional validity of the legislation. There is a principle of presumed constitutionality. This is a legislative enactment, we will have to give due weightage to all arguments,” the bench noted.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu