August 05, 2026 09:10 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kejriwal marches to PM Modi's residence over E20 petrol, alleges 'Trump pressure' behind policy | DMK slams Vijay government over Udhayanidhi's arrest, calls it 'blatant cowardice' | Tamil Nadu political storm: Udhayanidhi Stalin arrested after Trisha remark row | Faridabad teacher stabbed 34 times in 30 seconds at school gate; shocking CCTV details emerge | 'It was a conspiracy': Brij Bhushan reacts after acquittal in wrestlers' sexual harassment case | After NEET protests, CJP backs Jharkhand students' agitation over alleged JPSC-JSSC exam irregularities | Brij Bhushan acquitted: Delhi Court clears ex-WFI chief in high-profile wrestlers' sexual harassment case | India finishes 4th at Commonwealth Games 2026 with 39 medals despite missing medal-rich sports | Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology

Ayodhya case: Review petition filed against SC verdict

| @indiablooms | Dec 02, 2019, at 03:41 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind on Monday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya case.

Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, a legal heir of original Ayodhya land dispute litigant, on Monday filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against its ruling in favour of the Ram temple at the disputed site, Hindustan Times reported.

This is the first review petition filed by the Muslim side on the verdict that was passed last month.

In a historic judgement to a politically-sensitive Ayodhya case which has been raging for almost 70 years, the Supreme Court recently paved way for the construction of Ram Temple in the disputed 2.77 acres of land in Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya dismissing the Sunni Waqf Board's claim to the land.

The apex court also directed that a mosque be built over 5 acres in a prominent location. 

The Board said it is not going to accept the alternative five-acre land.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.