July 22, 2026 06:56 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'We won't leave Jantar Mantar until Dharmendra Pradhan resigns': CJP draws red line | 'Don't waste our time': Supreme Court snubs plea on NEET protest crackdown | Trump's 200% tariff bomb on generic drugs: Here's how India could be hit | Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra lead Congress march to PM Modi's residence over student protest crackdown | 'We can't ignore his concerns': Delhi HC gives Sonam Wangchuk big relief, clears shift to private hospital | 'Students are being tortured': Mamata Banerjee offers to join CJP protest in Delhi | Sikkim tunnel horror: 8 dead, several feared trapped after NHPC project collapse | As NEET protests intensify, PM Modi defends govt action, calls for 'foolproof' education system | After NEET storm, Modi govt faces fresh challenge as farmers march to Delhi over India-US trade deal | Jantar Mantar reclaimed! CJP defies overnight police eviction, returns to protest site
Anil Deshmukh

Anil Deshmukh again sent to ED custody

| @indiablooms | Nov 08, 2021, at 12:48 am

Mumbai/UNI: The Bombay High Court on Sunday set aside a Special PMLA Court order granting 14 days' judicial custody to former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh and remanded him back to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for five days.

Vacation Judge Justice MJ Jamdar on Sunday passed an order in response to an urgent plea filed by the ED, challenging Special Court Judge PR Sitre's ruling on Saturday, declining the agency's plea for extension of Deshmukh's custody by nine more days.

Deshmukh's lawyers Senior Advocate Vikram Chaudhri and Aniket Nikam submitted to the court that without getting into merits or maintainability of the ED application, they were volunteering cooperation and not shying away from the investigation and hence, not objecting to the further remand.

ED's lawyers, Additional Solicitor-General Anil Singh and Advocate Shreeram Shirsat argued in the Bombay High Court that they were not granted further custody by the Special PMLA Court, thus denial of sufficient and adequate opportunity to probe the case having serious ramifications and when the investigations are at a crucial state.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.