January 23, 2025 04:59 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'He was dancing while walking': Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane doubts Saif Ali Khan's stabbing incident | 'Open to legitimate return of Indians illegally staying in the US': Jaishankar | New fire erupts in Los Angeles, forces evacuation of tens of thousands | 'Very clear that Trump administration is prioritising India': S Jaishankar in US | 'Stop this ridiculous war now or face tariffs': Donald Trump tells Vladimir Putin | JDU sacks Manipur Chief after he declares to withdraw support from BJP government in state | 12 dead after passengers jump off train in Maharashtra over rumours of fire and collision with another train | Saif Ali Khan's attacker wanted to treat ailing mother in Bangladesh with the stolen money: Reports | US prioritises India as Secretary of State Marco Rubio picks Jaishankar for his maiden bilateral meeting | I don't want to stop, but also want competent people: Donald Trump on H-1B visa
Twitter video grab and Wikimedia Commons

All India Muslim Personal Law Board decides to file review petition against SC verdict on Ayodhya dispute

| @indiablooms | Nov 17, 2019, at 04:49 pm

New Delhi/IBNS:  The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Sunday said it will review the petition against the verdict given by the Supreme Court in connection with the Ayodhya temple-mosque dispute case this month.

The board said it will file a review petition within 30 days.

News18 quoted Arshad Madani, president of the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, one of the key players in the Ayodhya mediation process, saying "the top court in its judgment said that the mosque was not built by demolishing a temple, yet the mosque was not given to us." "So we will file a review petition and ask for what is rightfully ours."

In a historic judgement to a politically-sensitive Ayodhya case which has been raging for almost 70 years, the Supreme Court recently paved way for the construction of Ram Temple in the disputed 2.77 acres of land in Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya dismissing the Sunni Waqf Board's claim to the land.

The apex court also directed that a mosque be built over 5 acres in a prominent location. 

The Board said it is not going to accept the alternative five-acre land.

"We cannot accept any land in lieu of the masjid," the board was quoted as saying by the media.

Amid a tightened security across the nation and particularly in Uttar Pradesh, a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi asked the Indian government to set up a trust within three months to decide on the disputed Ayodhya land for the Hindus to build a temple, while they asked for a five-acre land for the Muslims to construct a mosque in a prominent alternative location.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.