December 23, 2024 10:49 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
I don't blame Allu Arjun, ready to withdraw case: Pushpa 2 stampede victim's husband | Indian New Wave Cinema Architect Shyam Benegal dies at age 90 | Cylinder blast at a temple in Karnataka's Hubbali injures nine people | Kuwait PM personally sees off Modi at airport as Indian premier concludes two-day trip | Three pro-Khalistani terrorists, who attacked a police outpost in Gurdaspur, killed in an encounter | Who is Sriram Krishnan, an Indian-American picked by Donald Trump as US AI policy advisor? | Mohali building collapse: Death toll rises to 2, many feared trapped for 17 hours | 4-year-old killed after speeding car driven by a teen hits him in Mumbai | PM Modi attends opening ceremony of Arabian Gulf Cup in Kuwait | Jaipur gas tanker crash: Toll touches 14, 30 critical
Amazon Future deal

Jolt for Future as Delhi HC dismisses plea seeking ending of arbitration proceedings with Amazon

| @indiablooms | Jan 05, 2022, at 02:47 am

New Delhi/IBNS: In a major setback to Future Group, the Delhi High Court has dismissed the pleas filed by Future Group of companies to terminate the arbitration proceedings with Amazon going on in Singapore International Arbitration Centre, media reports said.

Kishore Biyani’s Future group had approached the Delhi High Court seeking direction for the Singapore tribunal to hear termination application ahead of the scheduled hearings in the arbitration case.

Citing Competition Commission of India's (CCI) suspension of Amazon's deal with Future Group after reviewing complaints that US-based e-commerce giant concealed information while seeking regulatory approval, Future group argued that the agreement that included the clause for the arbitration proceedings itself is rendered invalid. In the same breath, it added that the ongoing legal proceedings would be irrelevant, Money Control reported.

Opposing Future's arguments, Amazon said that arbitration and the underlying contract are independent of each other. Also, Amazon said, it has legal options, such as appeals, available against the CCI order.

The case was heard for three hours on January 3 owing to the urgency in the case cited.

The court reserved its order to be delivered on the following day, just ahead of the scheduled dates set out by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre for its meeting to carry out the arbitration proceedings in the case.

The tribunal is set to meet between January 5 and 7 to proceed with the hearings in the case for deciding the quantum of damages that the Future group would be liable to pay to Amazon.

Earlier, the court found Future Retail Ltd to be a valid related party to the contractual arrangement entered into between Amazon and Biyani-led Future Coupons. Following this, the court is now tasked with ascertaing the quantum of liability.

The Future group petitioned the high court to have the arbitration proceedings terminated altogether for the same but to no avail. Future Group's attemp to convince the Singapore tribunal about the same also failed.

Future group's counsel called this “defiance of Indian law” and “defiance of the CCI order”, making a fervent case for the arbitration to be terminated, the report stated.

Future Retail had announced its asset sale deal with Reliance Industries Ltd’s wholly owned subsidiary, Reliance Retail. However, Amazon invoked arbitration arguing that its deal wih Future Coupons prevented Future Retail also, in capacity of related party, from entering into agreements with certain entities including the Mukesh Dhirubhai Ambani group.

Future Retail claimed that it was not bound by the deal between Amazon and Future Retail’s promoter firm. 

Future Retail's asset sale to Reliance Retail was stayed by Singapore arbitrator in October 2020 and the validity of this order was finally affirmed by the Supreme Court in August 2021.

Meanwhile, Future Group moved the CCI seeking the cancellation of the anti-trust regulator's approval to its deal with Amazon on grounds that the US-based e-commerce giant concealed information while seeking regulatory approval.

Background

On August 29, 2020, Future Group had announced the sale of its retail and wholesale assets to Reliance Retail Ltd for Rs 24,713-crore.

In August 2019, Amazon had bought 49 per cent stake in Future Coupons for Rs 1,500 crore.

Amazon said its 2019 deal with Future Group prevents it from selling the shares of Future Retail to RIL, its biggest rival in India, as the world's biggest e-commerce platform indirectly owns about a 3.5 per cent stake in Future Retail. Future denies the allegations.

On October 25, 2020, Amazon won an injunction to halt the sale from a Singapore arbitrator that both the entities had agreed to use in case of dispute.

The Court had written to BSE and SEBI to uphold the ruling.

Later, Amazon sent a legal notice to Future Coupons over its deal with Reliance.

In January, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) cleared the Rs 24,713 crore retail asset sale of Future Group to Mukesh Ambai-led Reliance Industries with conditions.

Future Group must specifically mention the case pending before the Delhi High Court and arbitration proceedings by the global e-commerce major Amazon contesting the deal, SEBI directed while issuing the clearance in January, 2021.

The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) had also granted its "no adverse observation" report, it added.

"The letters issued by BSE & NSE clearly state that comments of SEBI on the "draft scheme of arrangement" (proposed transaction) are subject to the outcome of the ongoing arbitration and any other legal proceedings. We will continue to pursue our legal remedies to enforce our rights," Amazon spokesperson had said post the development.

In December 2020, the Delhi High Court quashed Future Group's petition seeking its directive restraining Amazon from interfering in the asset sale to Reliance.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.