October 09, 2026 08:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Bold and inventive’: Canadian poet Anne Carson wins 2026 Nobel Prize in Literature | ‘Attempt to destabilise world’s largest democracy’: 42 retired judges rally behind Gyanesh Kumar over ‘vote chori’ row | ‘Vote chor, gaddi chod’: Dhruv Rathee, Prakash Raj join Bengaluru protest against Gyanesh Kumar | India condemns Houthi attacks on Saudi airports, calls targeting of civilian infrastructure unacceptable | Dalal Street bloodbath: Investors lose Rs. 8 lakh crore as Sensex crashes over 1,000 points | Amazon layoffs hit India, US and UK: Fresh job cuts rock e-commerce giant amid festive shopping season | Bollywood mourns Nana Patekar: Anupam Kher, Akshay Kumar, Jr NTR, Suniel Shetty pay emotional tributes | ‘He was never wavering while expressing his opinions’: PM Modi mourns Nana Patekar | Nana Patekar dies at 75: Veteran actor suffers cardiac arrest at Goa home | RBI shocks borrowers with first repo rate hike since 2023; rates raised to 5.50%
Google
Image Credit: Pixabay

Android case: SC refuses to modify NCLAT's order upholding CCI's penalty on Google

| @indiablooms | Feb 11, 2023, at 03:43 am

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday rejected Google’s plea to modify its January 19 order in a case of unfair and anti-competitive practices related to Android devices, media reports said.

On January 19, the SC didn’t grant interim relief to the tech giant against NCLAT order upholding the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI's) penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore pertaining to the allegations of unfair and anti-competitive practices related to Android devices.

A Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala said the bench can at the most add "without prejudice" in the January 19 order and nothing more.

The bench said the company can raise its grievances during the hearing of its appeal before the NCLAT.

Google’s counsel senior advocate said some portion of the January 19 order needs to be deleted.

However, the court said it wouldn’t order a deletion of any part of the judgment and asked the company to raise all these grievances during the hearing of the appeals.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.